• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Adlex Solicitors

UK internet and domain name lawyers

Call us now: +44 (0) 207 317 8404   Email us now  

Request Callback
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Website and App Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy and GDPR
      • Intro
      • Privacy Policies
      • Cookies and GDPR
    • Contracts
      • Intro
      • Website / App Design and Development Contracts
      • Web Hosting Contracts
      • White Label and Content Distribution Contracts
      • SEO Contracts
      • Internet Affiliate, Advertising and Marketing Contracts
    • Disputes
      • Intro
      • Domain Name Disputes and Cybersquatting
        • Intro
        • UDRP
        • Nominet’s DRS
        • Cybersquatting
        • Domain Name Hijacking
        • Domain Name Law
        • Domain Names and Trade Marks / Passing Off
        • Adlex’s Domain Name Legal Expertise
        • Free Legal Opinion
      • Online Copyright Infringement
      • Internet Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off
    • Content Removal
      • Intro
      • Removal From Google Search Results
      • Removal From Facebook and Other Social Media
      • Removal From Websites
      • Internet Defamation
      • Right to be Forgotten
  • Who We Are
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home  ›  What We Do  ›  Content Removal  ›  Right to be Forgotten

Right to be forgotten in Google and other search engines

What is the online right to be forgotten?

This right, under EU law, derives from a May 2014 ruling of the European Court of Justice in a case where a Spanish individual successfully sought removal of Google search results relating to a newspaper article about an auction notice placed on his home some 16 years previously.
Unexpectedly, the European Court decided that individuals had a right to seek removal from Google (and other search engines) of search results on privacy grounds in certain circumstances.

Is it the same as the GDPR “right to erasure”?

The EU data protection law, known as the GDPR, which came into force in 2018, includes an individual’s “right to erasure”, also known as the “right to be forgotten”, under which you are entitled (subject to certain restrictions) to seek deletion of your personal information by anyone who holds your personal information – i.e., not just search engines. So the GDPR right to erasure is far wider than the 2014 EU court ruling, which still remains relevant for search engines.

Where does it apply?

The right to be forgotten applies in the EU only e.g. to Google UK and to local versions of Google in other EU countries. Following disputes with various EU data protection authorities, Google also started implementing such removals on Google.com insofar as accessed within the EU. However, note that, while the right to be forgotten doesn’t apply outside the EU (e.g., in the US), there may still be a case for removal from those search results based on privacy grounds.

What exactly can search engines be required to “forget” in the EU?

The 2014 EU court decision simply referred to personal information which was “inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation to the purposes for which they were processed”. So, not the clearest definition. However, EU data protection authorities have since issued guidance on the criteria which should be taken into account when assessing such requests plus there have been some court decisions. So, the landscape is now much clearer than it was. The factors include: any public role played by the individual; whether the individual is a child; whether the information relates to private life or is sensitive; the journalistic context etc. So It’s crucial to deal with these criteria when making a request under the right to be forgotten.

Is it necessary to show that material is inaccurate?

While inaccuracy (if proved) is one of the factors which will be taken into account in assessing a right to be forgotten request, it isn’t essential. The right to be forgotten revolves around privacy, unlike say defamation where truth of what is being said is a key factor. For example, in the Google Spain case (see above), the search result accurately reflected the fact that an auction notice had been placed on the complainant’s home. The point was that the information was so old that it was no longer relevant and unfairly impacted on the individual’s privacy.

What about convictions for criminal offences?

In principle, reference to criminal convictions can be removed but it all depends on the circumstances. The older, and more minor, the conviction, the more likely that de-listing will be granted. Other factors include whether the conviction is “spent” (i.e. covered by the law about rehabilitation of offenders – but this isn’t conclusive), acknowledgment of guilt and remorse, and, for business-related crimes, whether the offender is now operating in the same field or not.

Which search terms are covered?

Only searches against the person’s exact name e.g., “John Smith”. The right doesn’t apply if extra qualifying terms are added, even if they relate say to the person’s location, e.g., “John Smith London”.

Is there a right of appeal?

Yes. If Google or the other search engines reject a right to be forgotten request, there is a right of appeal to your local data protection authority. In the UK, this is the Information Commissioner’s Office.

What’s the best strategy?

In our experience, it’s best not to quickly dash off a request via the form on the search engine website. Google and other search engines rarely change their mind. While there is still a right of appeal to the data protection authority, you might as well maximise your chances of removal by putting in a strong submission first time round.

Instead, the submission should carefully address the factors which search engines are required to take into account – as set out in official guidance and court decisions. The same applies of course if appealing to a data protection authority. Relevant supporting evidence should be supplied if applicable.

Primary Sidebar

  • Website and App Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy and GDPR
    • Intro
    • Privacy Policies
    • Cookies and GDPR
  • Contracts
    • Intro
    • Website / App Design and Development Contracts
    • Web Hosting Contracts
    • White Label and Content Distribution Contracts
    • SEO Contracts
    • Internet Affiliate, Advertising and Marketing Contracts
  • Disputes
    • Intro
    • Domain Name Disputes and Cybersquatting
      • Intro
      • UDRP
      • Nominet’s DRS
      • Cybersquatting
      • Domain Name Hijacking
      • Domain Name Law
      • Domain Names and Trade Marks / Passing Off
      • Adlex’s Domain Name Legal Expertise
      • Free Legal Opinion
    • Online Copyright Infringement
    • Internet Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off
  • Content Removal
    • Intro
    • Removal From Google Search Results
    • Removal From Facebook and Other Social Media
    • Removal From Websites
    • Internet Defamation
    • Right to be Forgotten

Blog Categories

  • Domain Name Disputes
  • Internet Content Removal

Recent Blog Posts

  • Helping Google “Forget” – Removing Convictions from the Web
  • 10 Top Tips for Writing a Domain Dispute Complaint

How Adlex Solicitors Can Help You

For a free initial chat, call Adam of Adlex now on +44 (0) 207 317 8404 or request a callback or email.

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Privacy and Cookies Policy
  • Complaints

© Adlex Solicitors 2001 - 2021. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA number 344672).

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn More